Skip to Content

Bad Faith Blog

We cover current issues, highlights and best practices exclusively on claims of bad faith and extra contractual damages.

Bad Faith Blog
October 17, 2016

Insurer’s Failure to Reassess Value of Claim Results in Bad Faith

Summary: Bamford filed suit against Regent to recover for bad faith after Regent refused to settle a car accident case within its $6 million policy limit leading to an adverse verdict and judgment for $10.6 million. At trial in the bad faith case, the jury awarded the Bamford approximately $2 million. On appeal, the court held that Bamford presented sufficient evidence that Regent acted in bad faith in failing to settle the plaintiffs’ claims within the policy limits.

Bad Faith Blog
January 13, 2016

A Rhode Island Insurer’s Duties Extend to Their Insureds’ Assignees

Summary: Michelle Asermely rear-ended a vehicle driven by Mark Rendine but owned by Julieanne Bernier. Bernier had car insurance issued by Allstate Insurance Company with a policy limit of $50,000. Asermely’s lawsuit against both Rendine and Bernier went to arbitration where the arbitrator awarded Asermely $47,557.37, but also found her 25 percent at fault. Her attorney wrote a letter to the arbitrator saying that “plaintiff will accept the award of the arbitrator,” but the defendants rejected it and proceeded to trial. A jury entered a total judgment of $86,333.57, which included interest, and found Asermely 60 percent at fault. After trial, Allstate allegedly made a check out to Asermely for the policy limit of $50,000 as “final settlement of any and all claims arising from bodily injury and property damage caused by accident on 7/9/84.” Asermely refused to cash the check and instead sued to collect on the judgment. At that point, Rendine and Bernier assigned their rights to Asermely. Allstate later issued a second check for $50,000 to Asermely, but this time did not include the release language. Asermely cashed the second check, but later sued Allstate.

Bad Faith Blog
January 6, 2016

Arkansas Supreme Court: Third Party Excess Liability Claim Lies Only in Tort

Summary: Ethel Nelson’s car struck Mary Busby on June 10, 1964 after Busby stepped onto the street. Nelson had an automobile insurance policy from Tri-State Insurance Company with a policy limit of $10,000. Busby made two settlement offers within the policy limits, but Tri-State refused both. At trial, the jury apportioned fault between Busby and Nelson and ultimately awarded Busby a total of $16,250, $13,000 to Busby herself and $3,250 to her husband (the first judgment). Nelson’s insurer, Tri-State, paid only the $10,000 policy limit.