Summary: Lamar Ragland sued State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) for State Farm’s alleged bad faith in failing to pay an underinsured motorist (UIM) claim. Ragland was injured in an automobile accident by an underinsured motorist in January 2012 and claimed that he was entitled to UIM benefits from State Farm for the same amount he could collect from the motorist. Two separate complaints were filed and then consolidated. The circuit court dismissed the bad faith claim. Ragland appealed. The Supreme Court of Alabama remanded to the circuit court which ruled the bad faith claim was final and appealable pursuant to Rule 54(b). State Farm moved to dismiss, claiming the circuit court had exceeded its discretion. The Supreme Court agreed and dismissed Ragland’s appeal as taken from a nonfinal judgment.
We cover current issues, highlights and best practices exclusively on claims of bad faith and extra contractual damages.
Summary: Dismissal of the mortgagor’s claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was affirmed on appeal. Under Pennsylvania law, there is no cognizable claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing separate from a breach of contract claim.
In New York, Breach of Duty of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing and Breach of Contract Are Distinct Causes of Action
Summary: The plaintiff was injured while operating a vehicle insured by GEICO. The plaintiff obtained the policy limits from the tortfeasor’s insurer and then made a claim under the SUM endorsement of the GEICO policy. GEICO denied the claim, and the plaintiff alleged GEICO unreasonably refused payment.